Document Type : Scientific-research

Author

Assistant Professor , Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of literature of Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran

Abstract

This research examines the meaning of love on the basis of mystical texts. The theoretical basis of the study is the relevance theory of Sperber and Wilson. The result of this research shows that in the review of mystical texts (a case study of a sonnet from Hafez's Divan) from the audience's point of view, love has no prescribed and predetermined meaning and is in fact a multiple phenomenon And because of the impossibility of expressing metaphysical experiences in mysticism the mystics’s speech is implicitly presented to the audience in the form of textural patterns. And this is the reason for the emergence of multiple phenomena of semantics outside the world of mysticism. According to relevance theory, these implications comprise a series of strong and weak hints that the reader of the text interprets depending on the encyclopedic information and the contents of long-term and short-term memory, as well as on his own perceptual context and other cases, and whenever the listener's expectation of the relevance of the message seems sufficient, he abandons the attempt. In addition, using a questionnaire created on the basis of relevance theory and the importance of contextual implications for the method of exploratory comprehension of words, factors such as age, gender, education, beliefs, etc. were examined and it showed that some of these factors can affect the reader's perception of love is effective in rereading mystical texts and others.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abdullah Ansari, A (1970). Resala. Corrected by Dastgerdi, V. Tehran: Forugi (In Persian)
Agha Gol Zadeh. F (2013). Descriptive Culture of Discourse Analysis and Pragmatics. Tehran: Elmi& Farhangi. (In Persian)Bamshadi P, Bamshadi J, Ansarian S (2016). “Semantic Analysis of Prepositions wæl, tɑ & ærɑ in Gurani Kurdish within the Cognitive Perspective”. Linguistic essays. No 7 (4) :59-80. (In Persian)
Erfani Beyzaee, M & kuchaki, N (2022). “An Investigation of the Meaning of Speaker Meaning in Metaphor, Based on Riet's Theory in Kaiser Amin pour’s Poetry” . Language Studies, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) Biannual Journal, Vol. 13, No. 1, Spring and Summer 2022, 353-379. (In Persian)
Grice, H. P. (1967). Logic and conversation: William James Lectures. Harvard. (In English)
Hafez-e- Shirazi, Sh (1941). Divan. Corrected by Ghazvini, M. Tehran: Zovar. (In Persian)
Ibn Arabi. M(2016). Al-Futuhat al-Makkiyya. Translated by Khajavi, M. Tehran: Mowla. (In Persian)
Jam, B(2021). “Extension of the Meaning and Physical Context of Religious words and Expressions in Spoken Persian: A Relevance-Theoretic Analysis”. Zabanshenasi va Guyeshhaye Khorasan.  No 4(13). Pp 55- 81. (In Persian)
Moghaddami, M(2011). “Theory of Discourse Analysis by Lacla and Mouffe and its criticism” . Journal of Social Cultural Knowledge. (In Persian)
Mowlavi, J(2009). Fihi Ma Fihi. Corrected by Sobhani, T. Tehran: Parse. (In Persian)
Mozafari A ,Nozhat B ,Jabbarpour S(2018). “Quest and the development of the theory of "love" in the mystical and philosophical notions and thoughts of Roozbahan and Ibn al Dabbagh”. Literary Text Research . No 76(22). Pp 32-37. (In Persian)
Nerlich Brigitte(1990). Change in Language. First published. London: Routledge  (In English)
le Martin, S(2020). Philosophy and Literature: An Introduction. Translated by Nabavi, M. Tehran: Agah . (In Persian)
Safavi, K(2013). “Spatial Interpretation of the Left-Right and Front-Back Axes in Persian”. Language Science. No1(1). Pp 11-40. (In Persian)
Shams, M& Meshkat, M(2020). “A Criticism of Theories of Meaning in Analytic Philosophy of Art”. Philosophy. No 2(45). Pp 61-93. (In Persian)
Sotudeh neya, M& Habib Allahi, M(2014). “The Role of Intralingual Context inin the Explanation of Allegorical Verses”. pazhouhesh name-ye quran va hadith. No 15(8). Pp55-88.Soltani, A(2008). Power, discourse and language: mechanisms of power in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: Ney. (In Persian)
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: communication and cognition. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell. (In English)
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Relevance theory. Handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell. (In English)
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In L. Horn and G. Ward (eds). Oxford: Blackwell. (In English)
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D.(1994) Outline of Relevance Theory. Links & Letters 1, 85-106. (In English)
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (2012) Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge University Press. (In English)
Youle, G(2000). Language and pragmatics. Translated by Raji, M& Tavangar, M. 4 Published, Tehran: Samt. (In Persian)