The Origin of Political Sufi Discourse in Iran and its Analysis based on Laclau and Mouffe's Discourse Theory

Heydari, Alireza; Monshizadeh, Mojtaba; Farazandehpour, Faezeh

doi:10.22051/jml.2022.39651.2321

Document Type : Scientific-research

Authors

¹ PhD Candidate in Ancient Culture and Languages, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran. Iran

² Professor of Linguistics Department, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

³ Assistant Professor of Linguistics Department , Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University,Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22051/jml.2022.39651.2321

Abstract

The Manichaean and Mazdakites influenced the ideas succeeding them. Expressing objection to the cruel kings’ oppression and injustice in society was one of the prominent features of some Mystic and Sufi sects. In this research, by studying the Zoroastrian and Manichaean literature and Islamic era texts, the origin of oppression-resistance of some Sufi discourses was detected and analyzed critically. This study is based on Laclau and Mouffe’s (1985) discourse theory. The common supposition in Islamic era (especially in Abbasid Caliphate) was that the movements against Baghdad Caliphate had roots in the ideologies of the Manichaean and Mazdakites. This institution of power, in its process of suppressing opponents and accusing them of “heresy”, often ascribed them to two sects loathed by the Zoroastrians (i.e., the Manichaean and Mazdakites). It seems that in the written documents, the depiction and narration of the methods of suppressing and punishing mystic rioters bore a striking resemblance to those deployed for murdering the followers of Mazdak and Mani in the Sassanid era. It is clarified in this research that the nodal point of the movements against Sassanid Empire and Abbasid Caliphate was “moral corruption” and “non-adherence” to religious beliefs; however, these anti-government discourses apparently highlighted “justice” as the “empty signifier” in the society.

Keywords

20.1001.1.20089384.1401.14.28.6.1

References

Akbarzadeh, D. (2007). The Inscriptions of Kartir the Priest of Priests, Tehran: Pazineh.

Amouzgar, Zh. (2016). “A simple report of Kartir inscriptions”, From Distant Past of Iran, Tehran: Moin.

Bahar, M. Esmailpoor, A. (2015). Manichean literature, Tehran: Karnameh

Bakhtiary, R. (2010). “Anti-Manichean texts (Zoroastrian middle Persian)”, Journal of Literary Studies, 43 (4), 27-42.

Fazilat. F. (2005). Dēnkard 3, Vol. 1, Tehran: Dehkhoda.

Fazilat. F.(2005). Dēnkard 3. Vol. 2, Tehran: Mehrayin.

Ferdowsi. A. Q. (2010). The Shahnameh, Edited by DJ. Khaleghi Motlagh. & M. Omidsalar, Tehran: The Centre for the Great Islamic Encyclopedia.

Gignoux, P (1996). “The unity of the spirit and body from the Manichean to Ismailia”, Farhang, 17, 334-337.

Hamedani. Ein-al-Qadat (1982). Nameha, Vol 2, Edited by Monzavi. A & Asiran. A., Tehran: Manouchehri & Zavvar.

Heidari, A., Monshizadeh, M. and Farazandehpour, F. (2020) “Discursive function of "Zandiq": Pahlavi literature and Arabic and Persian texts”, Research in Persian Language & Literature, 58, 45-77.

Ibn al-Nadim, M. I. (1968) Al-Fihrist, Translated by M. Tajaddod, Tehran: Bank e Bazargani ye Iran.

Jackson, A.V.w (2005). “On an allusion to Mānī in Dēnkard 9. 9.39. 13-16”, Translated by M. Karbassian. The Manichaean and Mazdakism Conflicts in Iran in Sassanid Period. Edited by M. Karbassian. & M. Karimi Zanjani Asl, Tehran: Akhtaran: 71-74.

Jahani Sareban, M. (1994). “Political sufism in Iran”, The Thesis for the MA in Persian language and literature. Chamran martyr of Ahwaz University.

Jorgensen, M & Philips, L (2015). Discourse analysis as theory and method, Translated by H. Jalili, Tehran: Ney.

Khaleghdad Hashemi, M. (1358). Tawzih al- Milal (The translate of Kitāb al–Milal wa al-Nihal of Shahristani), Edited by M. R. Jalali naini. Tehran: offset.

Laclau. E & Mouffe. C (2014). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, Translated by Rezayi. M. Tehran: sales.

Lincoln, B (2007). Religion, Empire, and Torture: The Case of Achaemenian Persia, with an appendix on Abu Ghraib, Translated by A. Maghsoudlou, Tehran: Hekmat E kalameh.

Mashayekh Farideni, M. H (1989). Translated Al-Aghani of Ab-al-Faraj Esfahani, Vol 1, Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi.

Mohajeri Zadwh, Q. (2009). “Tarikh Al-ssufia of Abu Abd Al-Rrahman Solami” Maaref, 68, 69-86.

Moin. M (2009). Mazdayasna & Persian literature, Vol 2, Tehran: University of Tehran.

Montazeri. S.S.r & Zahedi. F (2010). “The etymology and function of Zandigh in the various texts”, The History of Iran and Islam (Tarikh E Iran Va Islam), 20 (8), 170-194.

Monzavi. A (1997). “The period and condition of Ein-al-Qadat Hamedani (a study of the book Khassiat E Ayenegi)”, chista, 139-138, 614-630.

Nafisi. S (1998). The Origin of Sufism in Iran, Tehran: Forouqi.

Parniyani, M. Najafzadeh, B. (2015). “The investigation of killing Shihab Al-Din Yahya Suhrawardi (Shaykh Al-Ishraq) from the angle of sociology kill-elite theory”, New History, 5 (12), 86-107.

Pourjavady, N. (2003). “Persian Speak of primitive mystic, a section of Persian language history”, Nashr e Danesh, 20 (1), 8-16.

Qaffari Fard, A. (2013). The Hardly Killing history, Tehran: Negah.

Qomi, H. (1982). History of Qom, Translated by Taj al-Din, H. KH, Edited by J. Tehrani. Tehran: Tous.

Rahbar, A. Zareea, A. Solgi, M. (2012). “Discourse analysis of Tensar’s letter”, Political knowledge, 8 (2), 43-62.

Roudgar, M.J (2008). “Mysticism & politics”, Islamic mysticism, 4 (15), 35-56.

Schuon, F (2009). Castes and Races, Translated bay B. Alikhani. & K. Sasani, Tehran: Iranian Institute of philosophy.

Shafiei Kadkani, Mohammadreza (2007). Qalandariyya in History, The change of an Ideology, Tehran: Sokhan.

Shaked, Shaul (2014). From Zoroastrian Iran to Islam: studies in religious history and intercultural contacts, Translated by M. Saghebfar, Tehran: Qoqnoos.

Shakki. M. (2005). “Dorost dinan”, The Manichaean and Mazdakism Conflicts in Iran in Sassanid Period, Edited by M. Karbassian. & M. Karimi Zanjani Asl, Tehran: Akhtaran: 153-185.

Solgi, M. and Ahmadvand, Sh (2018). “The correlation between utopia and reality in Zorastrianism, Manichaeism and Mazdakism at the Sassanian age”, Political Science, 13 (2), 7-23.

Soltani, S. A. (2013). The Power, Discourse and Language, Tehran: Ney.

Taban, T. (1987). “The Zindiq heresy in early Islam” Iran Nameh. 5 (3), 455-478.

Tafazzoli, A (2018). Translation of Sūtkar-nask and Varštrmānsar-nask from Dēnkard 9. Tehran: The Centre for the Great Islamic Encyclopedia.

Tafazzoli, A. (2005). kartir and the union policy of the religion and government, The Heresy and Zandaqeh in Iran in Sassanid Period, Edited by M. Karbassian. and M. Karimi Zanjani Asl, Tehran: Akhtaran, 31-46.

Taheri Eraghi, A. (2005). Denial write against to Manichean in Islamic age, The Manichaean and Mazdakism Conflicts in Iran in Sassanid Period, Edited by M. Karbassian. and M. Karimi Zanjani Asl. Tehran: Akhtaran: 99-113.

Taheri, M. Momeni Sani, M (2010). “Comparative study of Mazdak story in Shahnameh and other historical sources”, The bulletin of Persian Language an Litarature (Gowhar E Gouya), 4 (2), 59-76.

Toosi. Khaje Nizam al-Mulk (1955). Siyar al-Muluk, Edited by M. Ghazvini.

Widengren. G. (2016). Mani and Manichaeism, Translated by N. Safa Esfahani. N. Tehran: Markaz.

Yarshater, E. (2001). The Seleucid, Parthian and Sasanian Periods, Vol 3, Part 2. Translated by H. Anoushe, Thehran: Amirkabir.

Zarrinkoob, A. (1984). The History of Iran after Islam, Tehran: Amirkabir.

Zarrinkoob, A. Zarrinkoob, R. (2008). The History of Iran (4) Sassanid Political History, Tehran: Samt.

Zekavati Gharagozlou. A. (2020) “ Ayn al-Quzat Hamadani’, the Great Islamic Encyclopedia, Unpublished and online version in the website of the centre for the great Islamic encyclopedia, In this linke: https://www.cgie.org.ir/fa/article/263182 (2021 19 January).

Ziai, H. (1991). “On the political doctrine of the illuminationist philosophy”, Iran Nameh, 9 (3), 396-410.

Mystical Literature

The Origin of Political Sufi Discourse in Iran and its Analysis based on Laclau and Mouffe's Discourse Theory

References

References

Volume 14, Issue 28
Spring 2022
April 2022
Pages 153-187

The Origin of Political Sufi Discourse in Iran and its Analysis based on Laclau and Mouffe's Discourse Theory

References

References

Volume 14, Issue 28Spring 2022April 2022Pages 153-187

Volume 14, Issue 28
Spring 2022
April 2022
Pages 153-187