Document Type : Scientific-research

Authors

1 PhD candidate of Persian Language and Literature, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.

Abstract

Sanai, the founder of Persian mystical poetry, is one of the poets who strived to introduce the language of mysticism practically and at times theoretically. So far, several theories have been proposed regarding mystical language. These theories, where they are based on the more general theories of language of the target religion, fall into two categories of formative theories and role-oriented theories. One of the role-oriented theories about the language of metaphysical experiences is John Herman Randall's theory. This philosopher considers religion, just like science and art, as a kind of human activity that contributes to human culture, and lists four roles for religious mysteries and myths. The present article, adopting a descriptive and analytical research method, renders a new analysis of anecdote functions in Sanai's Hadiqat al-Haqiqah and examines their correspondence to Randall's theory. The findings reveal that Sanai deploys anecdote for two purposes; first, to clarify ontological, theological, cosmological, and anthropological issues and to correct social problems, and second, among Randall's four roles, Sanai’s Hadiqat al-Haqiqah anecdotes, in the first place, play the role of stimulating practical senses and strengthening practical commitments (Anthropological), and stimulating senses of cooperation and social cohesion (Social), in the second place. The next two roles, namely the transmission of unspeakable human experiences (Theological) and the explanation of the glorious divine system (Cosmological) have been considered less by this mystic poet. These roles place Sanai’s mysticism under the banner of Khorasan School, which is better known as humanism and socialism.

Keywords

References
Ali zamani, A. (2007). Speaking of God. Tehran: Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought.
Anoushe, H. (1997). Dictionary of Persian Literature. Tehran: Printing and Publishing Organization.
Anvari, H. (2003). Farhang Bozorg Sokhan (Volume 8). Tehran: Sokhan.
Anzali,A. (2004). Structuralism, Tradition and Mysticism (A study in the Field of Mystical Experience, Excerpts from Steven Katz's Articles). Qom: Ayat Eshgh.
Farrokhnia, M. (2010). “Storytelling Structure of Anecdotes in Sanai Hadigheh”. Kavshanameh Scientific Quarterly. No. 21. 
Fouladi, A. (2010). The Language of Mysticism. Tehran: Sokhan.
Hassanzadeh, E. (2013). “Politics in Sanai Thought”.  Sanai Research (Proceedings of Hakim Sanai International Conference). prepared by M. Hosseini. 2th ed. Tehran: Khane-ye-ketab.
Hick, J. (1997(. Philosophy of religion. Translated by Behzad Saleki. Tehran: Al-Huda International Publications
khatami, A. (2014). “Narrative and Its Mystical Application in Hadith”. persian literature. No 13.
Mirzaei Khalilabadi, B.and others  (2011).  “The Structural-Communicative Pattern of Hadiqa's Tales”. Textology of Persian literature. Vol 3. Issue1. pp 55-74.
Moazani, A M.  and M. Khalilian  (2017). “Story-Telling Process in the Anecdotes of Hadiqat-al-Haqiqa by Sanāʾi”. Scientific Interpretation and Analysis of Persian Language and Literature Texts (Dehkhoda). Vol 8. Issue 30. pp 199-229.
Perrine, L. (2008). Story and Structure. Translated by M. Soleymani. 7th ed. Tehran:   Surah Mehr Publications.
Pournamdarian, T. (2021).  Dar Saye-e Aftab: Persian poetry and deconstruction in Rumi's poetry. 5th ed. Tehran: Sokhan.
Pournamdarian, T. (2011). Didar Ba Simorq (Poetry, mysticism and Attar's thoughts). 5th ed. Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Qanuni, H. (2013). “Sanai's Attitude to Fiction in Hadigheh and Divan”.  Fiction Studies. Tehran: Payame Noor University. No. 4.
Razmjoo, H. (1993). Literary Types and Their Works in Persian Language. Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi Pubishing Institute.
Saedi Roshan, M. (2012). The language of the Quran and Its Issues. Qom: Hozeh and University Research Institute; Tehran: Study and Development Organization (Position).
Saedi Roshan, M.(2016). Analysis of the language of the Qur'an and the methodology of understanding it. Tehran: Research Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought, Publishing Organization; Qom: Research Institute and University.
Sanai, A. (2004). Hadiqat-Al-Haqiqah va  Shariat-Al-Tariqah. Edited by Modarres-eRazavi.  6th ed. Tehran: Institute of Publishing and Printing, University of Tehran.
Shafi'i Kadkani, M. (1997).  Taziyane-ha-ye Solouk  (Critique and analysis of some poems by Hakim Sanai) 2th ed Tehran: Agah Publishing Institute ..
Taghavi, M. (2006). “Sanai Storytelling, a Crazy Person in Ghazni (Thoughts and Works of Hakim Sanai)”. prepared by A. Mohammadkhani and M. Fotoohi. Tehran: Sokhan.
Tillich, P. (1957). Dynamics of Faith. Newyork-University.
Yahaghi, M. (1986). “from sharia and poetry”. Nashr Danesh. No 34. pp 58-61.
Zomorrodi, H. (2016). Theory of Paradoxes in Structure of Erfans language. Tehran: zavvar.