Document Type : Scientific-research

Authors

1 Professor of Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Mazandaran, Iran

2 MA in Persian Language and Literature, University of Mazandaran, Mazandaran, Iran,

Abstract

Cognitive Linguistics through examination of relationships between mind and language strives to discover meaning. It also achieves novel understanding of the subjects through examination of pictorial schemas and discovery of assumptions between mental and real fields. Kinesthetic schemas are those pictorial schemas in which human, stimulated by his/her movement experiences and other mobile phenomena, creates mobile conceptual and perceptual structures for mental phenomena. Mantegh-o Teir, thanks to its didactic-mystical characteristics in narrating journey of birds and its symbolic language, could lend itself to being examined in terms of kinesthetic schemas. This schema implies Attar’s determined efforts on returning to the origin. The questions of the article are what the indications and objectives of ascending and descending movements in Mantegh-o Teir are and what mystical issues Attar is trying to explain by illustrating the journey of birds. The principle of the fall of man is a positive one to Attar which is the result of integration of body and spirit. In other words, he assumes man as the “wonder of mysteries”. His purpose in this descending schema is to delineate the obstacles and the necessity of passing through them. In ascending schema, Attar aims to explain the essence and significance of returning to the origin. The most important requirement for the ascending movement is “self-detachment” and the worst kind of descending movement is decline in human attributes or qualities; corollary to which is loss of power of perception. The requirement for the ascending journey is disregarding this world and the other world and setting one’s heart just on The Right (Hagh); which becomes possible by means of “love” and eventually culminates in unity. Each of these schemas can be elucidated by qualitative and quantitative movements.       

Keywords

References
The Holy Qur’an (n.d.). (M. Elahi Ghomshe-ee, Trans.). Osveh.
Ashrafzadeh, R. (1994). Tajali ramz va revayat dar she’re Attar Neyshabouri [Manifestation of mystery and narrative in Attar Neyshabouri’s poetry]. Asatir.
Bagheri Khalili, A., & Mehrabi Kali, M. (2013). The cycle schema in the poetry of Sa’di and Hafez. Literary Criticism, 6 (23), 125-148.
Beyabany, A., & Talebian, Y. (2012). Investigating bias metaphor and image schemas in Shamloo’s poems. Literary Criticism, 1 (1), 99-126.
Ghaeminia, A. (2009). The role of conceptual metaphors in religious epistemology. Qabasat, (4), 159-184.
Ghaeminia, A. (2011). Ma’na shenasi shenakhti Qur’an karim [Cognitive semantics of the holy Qur’an]. Research Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought.
Gouharin, S. S. (2006). Mantegh-o Teyr [Conference of birds] (23rd ed.). Elmi-Farhangi.
Hasan Pour Alashti, H., Khalili Aliakbar, B., Kazemi, M. (2016). The mortality of soul in the Gazals of Sanaei: A cognitive analysis based on motion schema. Journal of Mytho-Mystic Literature, 12 (45), 35-59. 
Kovecses, Z. (2019). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). (Sh. Pour Ebrahimi, Trans.). The Center for Research and Development in Humanities (SAMT) Publications.
Kurd Zafaranloo Kambuziya, A., & Hajian, Kh. (2010). A survey of the orientational metaphors in Qur’an: ‎A cognitive approach. Literary Criticism, 3(9), 115-139.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by (3rd ed.). (J. Mirzabeigi, Trans.). Agah.
Mobasheri, M., & Valizadeh Pasha, L. (2019). A comparative study of the conceptual metaphor of "love is war" in the conceptualization of Fana in Diwan-e Shams and the Qur'an. Literary-Quranic Researches, 1 (1), 179-222.
Pour Ebrahim, Sh. (2016). The study of methods of translation of metaphors in terms of kinesthetic schemas in Nahjolbalagha. Journal of Nahjolbalgha, 4 (14), 35-54. 
Pour Namdarian, T. (2007). Ramz va dastanhaye ramzi dar she’re Farsi [Symbol and symbolic stories in Persian literature] (6th ed.). Elmi-Farhangi.
Rasekh Mahand, M. (2010). Daramadi br zabanshenasi shenakhti [An introduction to cognitive linguistics]. The Center for Research and Development in Humanities (SAMT) Publications.
Sadeghi Shahpar, A., & Sadeghi Shahpar, R. (2013). The mystical stages in Manṭiq-uṭ-Ṭayr of Attar and Yoga Sutras of Patanjali: A comparative study.Journal of Mytho-Mystic Literature, 9 (6), 129-168.
Safavi, K. (2011). Daramadi bar ma’ni shenasi [An introduction to semantics] (4th ed.). Soore Mehr Publications.
Sajadi, S. J. (1983). Farhange loghat va estelahate va ta’abire erfani [A glossary of mystical vocabularies and idiomatic terminologies](3rd ed.). Tahouri.
Saliba, J. (1987). Farhange falsafi [Philosophy Lexicon] (M. Saneie Darehbidi, Trans.). Hekmat.
Salimi Kouchi, E., & Ghasemi Esfahani, N. (2019). Intertextual study of Manṭiq-uṭ-Ṭayr’s seven valleys of love in “The man-trunk and his traveler” of Andrée Chédid. Research in Contemporary World Literature, 24(2), 411-431.
Tabatabaie, S. M. (1984-85). Tafsire almizan [Almizan exegesis](N. Makarem Shirazi, Trans.). Raja Cultural Press.
Waredi, Z. (2007). Return: A glance at Odysseus’s journey and birds in Manṭiq-uṭ-Ṭayr. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Shiraz University, 23(3), 218-228.