Document Type : Scientific-research

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate of Persian Language and Literature, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature Department, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature Department, University of Mazandara,. Babolsar, Iran

4 Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature Department, University of Mazandaran Babolsar, Iran

Abstract

Since the ancient times, there have always been groups of people who believed in the order of the universe. The concept of discontinuous imaginal world was raised in the Muslim world as the mediator between the world of intellect and the world of matter, of course under different titles. The imagination was also considered to be the mediator between sense and reason. Moreover, there exist religious and mystical experiences in different nations which are named differently, including metaphysical powers (Kerāmāt), supernatural wonders (Khavāriq-e-ādāt), and the like. These issues were of great importance and recurrence among the Sufis and various texts have addressed them; one of which is Tazkirat-al-Awliā. Henry Corbin, an Orientalogist, who applied phenomenological components in examining the mystical experiences of Sufis, recurrently reminds us of the necessity of proper understanding of it in its precise position, i.e. discontinuous imaginal universe. The present study, approaching Corbin’s method, which is the same as interpretation (ta’wil) or revelation of the veiled (Kashf-ol-Mahjoub), provides criteria that can be used to discern the imaginary dimension of the eventsin Tazkirat-al-Awliā. The findings of the study suggest that criteria such as sacred time, relationship with angels, subtle and imaginal descriptions, and the like could display the proper place of occurrence of imaginal events to readers of such texts as Tazkirat-al-Awliā.

Keywords

Attār, M. (2007). Tazkirat Al-awliā. (M. estelāmi Correction). Zavvar. Tehran. (In Persian)
- Chittick, W. (2004). Imaginary Worlds. (S. M. Yousef-Sāni Trans.). Imam Khomeini and Islamic Revolution Research Center. Tehran. (In Persian)
- Corbin,H. (1969). Creative imagination in the sufism of Ibn Arabi. (Rulph Manheim Trans.)Princeton university press. Princeton. (In Persian)
- ____________. (1979). The spiritual earth and the human body on the day of resurrection. (Z. Dehshiri Trans.). Tahouri. Tehran. (In Persian)
-____________. (2016). ____________. (E. Rahmati Trans.). Soufiā. Tehran.
- ____________. (2008 & 2013). Avicenna and the mystical parable. (E. Rahmati Trans.). Jāmi. Tehran. (In Persian)
- ____________. (2011a). Creative imagination in the sufism of Ibn Arabi. (E. Rahmati Trans.). Jāmi. Tehran. (In Persian)
-____________. (2011b). Temple and Revelation. (E. Rahmati Trans.). Institute of Boustān-e Ketāb. Qom. (In Persian)
- ____________. (2014). The Relationship between the Ishrāgh Philosophy and the Philosophy of Ancient Iran. (A. Fardid, & A. Golshan Trans.). Institute of Hikmat and Philosophy of Persia. Tehran. (In Persian)
- Ebrahimi Dinani, Gh. (2000). The Radius of Thought and Intuition in Suhrawardi's Philosophy. Hekmat. Tehran. (In Persian)
- Plotinus. (1999). Theologia. (H. Malekshāhi Trans.). Soroush. Tehran. (In Persian)
- Sattari, J. (1987). The Symbol &The Allegory in psychoanalysis. Tous. Tehran. (In Persian)
- Shāygān, D. (2015). Henry Corbin: The spiritual topography in Iranian Islam. (B. Parham Trans.). Farzānrouz. Tehran. (In Persian)
- Sohravardi, Y. (2011). Hikmat Al-eshrāgh. (S.J. Sajjadi Trans.). University of Tehran Publication. Tehran. (In Persian)