Mystical Literature

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Editorial Staff

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Registration guide in the system

Article submission guide

Utilities for Paper Writing

Pablons Registration Guide

Arbitration process

Judges of the Journal of Mystical Literature in2023

Judges of the Journal of Mystical Literature in 2022

Judges of the Journal of Mystical Literature in 2021

Reviewers in 2020

Reviewers in 2019

The Logic of Digression in Mathnavi: Explanatory Style and the Authority of the Narrator/Author

Document Type : Scientific-research

Author

Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Kurdistan University, Kurdistan, Iran

Abstract

In Rumi’s Mathnavi, the author-narrator has created levels of digression via continuous deployment of meta-language. Compared to other classical Persian texts, Mathnavi’s digressions are outstanding in terms of quantity, quality and variety. Mathnavi's digressions largely serve the purpose of explanation, but the didactic-deterrent function of explanations has led to the assumption that Mathnavi is an authoritarian text and the interaction of its author-narrator with the reader is one-sided. This assumption is the result of a cursory examination of the function of these digressions in Mathnavi as well as a disregard for their constitutive factors. In this descriptive-analytical research, after classifying instances of digression in Mathnavi, their authoritarian or anti-authoritarian aspects were formulated and interpreted. The results show that Mathnavi’s explanatory style enjoys two different authoritarian and anti-authoritarian levels. At the first level, the narrator uses preludes, axioms, reportage of the production, continuation and the ending of the stories, answers to the intended questions, interpretations of the symbols and expressions, conclusions and the like—all derived from the educational determinism and juristic education system of Maktabs—to express the meaning in a definitive and one-sided manner. On another level, via various kinds of quoting and references to different texts and individuals, and by embracing the notion of “acquisition” (kasb) as the epistemological backbone of fana—accompanied with decentralizing subject-agency—the narrator/author suspends his authority. Thus, one can draw two conclusions: first, not all of Mathnavi’s digressions and explanatory style are authoritarian; second, not all of Mathnavi’s authoritarian digressions are the result of mystical epistemology.

Keywords

References
-        Ahmadi, B. (1997). Chahar gozaresh az Tazkareh Al-Owliya [Four reports on Attar's Tazkareh Al-Owliya].Tehran: Markaz Publications.
 -        Ash’ari, A. A. (2006). Maghalat al-eslamiin & ekhtelaf almosalin: Research by Naeim Zarzour (Vol. 2). Beirut: Maktab Al-asriyeh.
 -        Bohm, D. (2002). About dialogue (L. Nickle, Ed.)(M. Hosseinnejad, Trans.).Tehran: Dialogue of Civilizations International Center, Cultural Research Bureau.
 -        Browne, M. N., & Stuart, M. K. (2013). Asking the right questions: A guide to critical thinking (K. Kamyab, Trans.). Tehran: Minooy-e Kherad Publications.
 -        Forouzanfar, B. (1991). Ma’khaze ghesas va tamisilat-e Mathnavi [The sources of Mathnavi’s parables and stories]. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications.
 -        Gadamer, H. G. (2000). Language as a mediator of hermeneutic experience. In Modern hermeneutics: Selection of works (pp. 201-236) (B. Ahmadi, et al, Trans.). Tehran: Markaz Publications.
 
-        Ghazimoradi, H. (2001). Estebdad dar Iran [Despotism in Iran]. Tehran: Akhtaran.
 -        Ghobadi, H., Gholmhoseinzade, Gh., Moshref, M., & Raminnia, M.(2010). Polyphony and dialogism in Mowlavi’s attitude to Jahd and Tavakol with emphasis on Shir and Nakhchiran story. Journal of Literary Studies, 17, 71-94.
 -        Holquist, M. (2016). Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world (M. Amirkhanloo, Trans.) Tehran: Niloofar Publications.
-        Homaei, J. (1994). Ma’ani va bayan [Rhetoric]. (M. Homaei, Ed.).Tehran: Homa Publications.
-        Jakobson, R. (2002). Linguistics and poetry analysis. In Collection of linguistic and literary criticism (pp. 71-80). (M. Khozan & H. Payandeh, Trans.) Tehran: Ney Publications.
 -        Jouve, V. (2015). Poetique du roman (N. Hejazi, Trans.) Tehran: Elmi & Farhangi Publications.
-        Kalabadi, A. M. (1992). Al-taarrof (M. J. Shariat. Ed.).Tehran: Asatir Publications.
 -        Law, J. (2016). After method: Mess in social science research (S. M. Azizi, Trans.).Tehran: Tarjoman Publications.
 -        Leblanc, J. (2014). Thinking clearly: A guide to critical thinking (M. Khosravani, Trans.) Tehran: Goman Publicatios.
 -        Lintvelt, J. (2011). Essai de typologie narrative: le “Point de vue” (A. Abbasi & N. Hejazi, Trans.). Tehran: Elmi & Farhangi Publications.
 -        Martin, W. (2003). Recent theories of narrative (M. Shahba, Trans.).Tehran: Hermes Publications.
 
-        Mokhtari, M. (2015). Ensan dar she’r-e moaser [Human in contemporary poetry]. Tehran: Toos Publications.
-        Mowlavi, J. M. (1996). Mathnavi (R. Nicholson, Ed.).Tehran: Toos Publications.
 -        NamvarMotlagh, B. (2016). Beinamatniyat: Az sakhtargrayi ta pasasakhtargarayi [Intertextuality: From structuralism to post-structuralism]. Tehran: Sokhan Publications.
 -        Norgard, N., et al. (2015). Key terms in stylistics (A. Rezaei Jamkarani & M. Farahmandfar, Trans.).Tehran: Morvarid Publications.
 -        Pajouhandeh, L. (2005). Philosophy and conditions of dialogue from Mowlavi's view to decisions of Bakhtin and Buber. Articles and Studies, 77, 11-34.
 -        Pournamdarian, T. (2001). Dar saye aftab: She'r-e farsi va sakhtarshekani dar she'r-e Mowlavi [Under the shadow of sun: Persian poetry and deconstructionalism in Mowlavi's poetry]. Tehran: Sokhan Publications.
 -        Prince, G. (2012). Narratology: The form and functioning of narrative (M. Shahba, Trans.). Tehran: Minooye Kherad Publications.
 -        Ranciere, J. (2016). The ignorant schoolmaster: Five lessons in intellectual emancipation (A. Gharib, Trans.) Tehran: Shirazeh Publications.
 -        Rimmon-Kenan, Sh. (2008). Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics (A.Horri, Trans.) Tehran: Niloofar Publications.
 
-        Rohbani, M. (2000). Farhang-e shargh va gharb: Tahlil-e tarikh az didgah-e ravanshenasi[East and West culture: Analysis of history in psychology].Tehran: Ney Publications.
 -        Schmidt, W. (2015). An introduction to narratology (T. Poor Namdarian & N. Pakmehr, Trans.) Tehran: Siahroud Publications.
 -        Semenenko, A. (2016). The texture of culture: An introduction to Yuri Lotman's semiotic theory (H. Safaraz, Trans.).Tehran: Elmi & Farhangi Publications.
 -        Sharifzadeh, R. (2018). Mozakereh ba ashya: Bruno Latour va nazariye koneshgar-shabake [Negotiation with objects: Bruno Latour and actor-network theory].Tehran: Ney Publications.
-        Tavakoli, H. R. (2010). Az esharat-e darya: Botighay-e revayat dar Mathnavi [From the signs of the sea: Poetic narrations of Mathnavi]. Tehran: Morvarid Publications.
 -        Waugh, P. (2011). Metafiction (Sh. Vahifipour, Trans.). Tehran: Cheshmeh Publications.
 -        Wolfson, H. A. (1989).The philosophy of the Kalam (A. Aram, Trans.).Tehran: Alhoda Publications.
 -        Womack, P. (2017). Dialogue (M. Sameni, Trans.).Tehran: Sina Publications.
 -        Zarrinkoob, A. (1993). Ser-e ney[Secret of the reed]. Tehran: Elmi Publications.
 -        Zarrinkoob, A. (1987). Bahr dar kuza [Sea in the jug]. Tehran: Elmi & Farhangi Publications.
Mystical Literature
Volume 9, Issue 17
August 2017
Pages 141-165
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics