Document Type : Scientific-research

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Linguistics and Language Education, Tarbiat Modares University.tehran. iran

2 Student of Persian Literature , Tarbiat Modares University. tehran. iran

Abstract

From the viewpoint of cognitive linguists, cognitive metaphor refers to any understanding and expression of abstract concepts in terms of concrete concepts. Among the various methods adopted by Lakoff and Turner in conceptual metaphor analysis, in this research, the concept of evolution in Rumi’s poems is examined based on the hierarchical feature of the great chain metaphor model. The study of Rumi’s poems shows that the hierarchical feature of the great chain metaphor, which represents a kind of evolution, is also found in Rumi’s mental set. Rumi sees human evolution as passing through the molds of plants, animals, and even human himself, and reaching the higher levels of angels and Divinenearness. The two latter levels have been overlooked by cognitive linguists. Rumi considers mortality and death a necessary condition for passing through lower levels and reaching higher levels, and displays this with a kind of directional metaphor, i.e. moving forward. It means the metaphorical perception of the features of one quiddity at a level is possible through the features of one quiddity at another level. In other words, we encounter a rebirth every time. Given the universal nature of the human body and the global patterns of our physical interactions with the world, this kind of relationship has been somewhat the same in different cultures, but Rumi’s worldview and experiences depict a more elevated evolution for human beings than the one viewed by linguists.

Keywords

-        Abedi, M. (2012). Comparison of conceptual metaphors in everyday written Persian and contemporary poetry (Unpublished master's thesis).University of Payame Noor, Tehran.
-        Afrashi, A., & Hesami, T. (2013). A new classification for analyzing conceptual metaphors: Exampels from Persian and Spanish.  Journal of Comparative Linguistics Researches, 3(5), 141-165.
-        Afrashi, A., Asi, S. M., & Jowlayi, K. (2015). Conceptual metaphors in Persian language: Cognitive and coupous-based analysis. Zabanshenakht (Language Studies), 6 (12), 39-61.
-        BadrHesari, K. (2005). Death of consciousness in Mathnavi and Shams Ghazals(Unpublished master's thesis).University of Tehran, Tehran.
-        Evans, V., & M. Green. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
-        Golfamm, A., & Yousefi Rad, F. (2002). Cognitive linguistics and metaphors.  Advances in Cognitive Science, 4(3), 59-64.
-        Haghighi, M. (2016). Comparative study of Kurdish proverbs from Kermanshah and Persia: From the viewpoint of cognitive semantics (Unpublished master's thesis).Alzahra University, Tehran.
-        Hashemi, Z. (2010). Conceptual metaphorical theory from the perspective of Lakoff and Johnson. Literary Studies, 12, 119-140.
-        Homaei, J. (2006). Mowlavi nama (6th ed.). Tehran: Agah Publications.
-        Hosseini, Z., & Faramarz Gharamelki, A. (2011). Experiencing types of death during life: Based on Mathnavi Ma’navi. Journal of Mystical Studies, 13, 87-116.
-        Izutsu, T. (1985). The concept of perpetual creation in religion of Islam and the Buddhist Zen (M. Kaviyani, Trans). Tehran: Elmi & Farhangi Publications.
-        Khalifeh, A. (1973). Rumi’s mysticism. (A. Mohamadi, & A. Mir Ataei, Trans.). Tehran: Zar Publications.
-        Kovecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press.
-        Kovecses, Z. (2014). Metaphor: A practical introduction. (Sh. Poor Ibrahim, Trans.). Tehran: SAMT Publications.
-        Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp.257-202). London: Combridge University Press.
-        Lakoff, G., & M. Johnson (2003[1980]). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
-        Lakoff, G., & M. Turner. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University Chicago Press.
-        Mo’tamedi, M. (1996). Mystics’ view of death. Keyhane Andishe, 5, 43 – 61.
-        Mohseni, Sh. (2011). Death from the viewpoint of Rumi. Journal of Persian Language and Literature, 4 (16), 130-140.
-        Moreno, A. I. (2005). An analysis of the cognitive dimension of proverbs in English and Spanish: The conceptual power of language reflecting popular believes. (SKASE) Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 2(1), 42-54.
-        Nabifar, N. (2013). A comparative study of English and Persian proverbs on bases of cognitive. (TJEAS) Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3(12), 2287-2302.
-        Nasafi , A. (1998). Perfect human. Tehran: Tahuri Library and Institut Français de Recherche en Iran.
-        Schimmell, A. (1988). Shokooh-e Shams [Glory of Shams].Tehran: Elmi & Farhangi Publications.
-        Seif, A. (2002). Eternal life in Hadiqa Mathnavi and Mathnavi Ma’navi. Faculty of Literature and Humanities, 52(164), 183-202.
-        Zarrinkoob, A. (1987). Bahr dar kuza [Sea in a jug]. Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi Publications.