Document Type : Scientific-research

Author

Assistant Professor of Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

Abstract

Meditation on the works and themes of poetry in the mystical genre shows that poets have changed the plot structure of previous anecdotes in order to create and convey a new message by relying on intertextual similarities. Examination of a wide range of original anecdotes in this genre reveals that poets have sought to create semantic-moral meanings, themes, and mystical atmosphere by changing the plot of narratives. In view of that, the present study, conducted by adopting a descriptive-analytical research method and using library resources, aims to investigate the status of narrative, plot, and intertextuality in some original poetic anecdotes in the mystical genre, and to create new structure, principles, and didactic meanings in the subsequent anecdotes. The findings show that the creators of the subsequent (new) narratives have made changes in the plot of the subsequent narrative in the mystical genre with the aim of changing the meaning, and this change has been done in three ways: “extending or reducing the plot”, “adding or reducing episodes to the narrative”, and “adding mystical meaning to the actions of actors by an open-ended trick”.

Keywords

Refrences
Abbasi, A. (2014). Applied Narratology. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press.
Attar, Sh.f. (2012). The logic of the Bird. Tehran: Kharazmi.
Beigi, H. (2013). History of the Prophets. Tehran: Danesh Beigi.
Ferdowsi, A. (2008). Shahnameh of Ferdowsi. Tehran: Phoenix.
Haddad, H. (2013). Modify the Story. Tehran: Asr Dastan.
Hashemzadeh, Q. (2017). Treatise on the Definition, Explanation and Classification of Mystical Stories. Tehran: Hermes.
Jami, A. (2016). Masnavi Haft Orang. Tehran: Toos.
Khosravi, H. (2009). “Symbol of sun Suhrawardi's allegorical works”. Mytho-Mystic Litrature. 5 (15). 56-72
Mahdavi, Y. (1977). Stories of the Quran: Taken from the commentary of Surabadi. Tehran: Kharazmi.
Mohammadi, M. (2002). Samad is the structure of a myth. Tehran: CHista.
Nizami, E. Maxzanolasear. (1383). Corrected by Vahid Dastgerdi. Tehran: Kharazmi.
Parsansab, M. (2011). Allegorical Stories - Persian Code. Tehran: Cheshmeh.
Pournamdarian, T. (2003). Meet Simorgh (Attar's poetry, mysticism and thoughts). Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Rezvanian, Q. (2010). The Narrative Structure of Mystical Anecdotes. Tehran: Sokhan.
Sadeghi, M. (2008). The Impact of Classical Persian Literature on Contemporary Fiction. Tehran: Amirkabir.
Sadraei, R. (2016). “Analysis of educational teachings in the intertextual study of two works (Parvin Etesami and Anvari)”. Journal of Educational Literature. 29. pp. 170-159.
Younesi, E. (2000). The Art of Storytelling. Tehran: Negah.
Zahiri S. M. I. A. (1983) Sandbadname. By A. Atash. Tehran: Ashna.